![]() So an 8GB movie on a 100mbit connection should take what.10-12 minutes assuming all b/w available? This would probably have to be salted with a bandwidth number provided by the user (or computed via an under the hood speed test). If this is still being considered I would vote for speed check or some type of calculation based on time remaining of the torrent vs download size. ![]() Sorry for the long post, and thanks in advance for your time. So a profile suggestion would be, for example, to sort by number of seeds/peers within the same quality, which isn't happening from what I'm seeing when I use Manual Search and select to order the results according to Auto-Search criteria. Right now I'ḿ having a problem with older seasons, where, within the same quality (an episode of Marvel's Agent Carter from Season 1 at 720p is an example I had), the torrent with the lowest number of seeds (just one seed which eventually disappears and the download stalls) is getting selected, where there are other torrentz with the same quality, equally acceptable by the profile and a lot more peers that are not being downloaded. Instead I would suggest creating three or four different priority "profiles" fo the torrents, similarly to what you have done with the qualities, from which the user could select the one better suiting its needs. I know someone suggested this in another thread, but what they were suggesting was to make it possible to configure it in a fine-grained manner, which could be too complex and produce undesired results. Regarding issue 2, I believe that a better workaround would be the possibility to select how Automatic Search prioritizes the results it gets from the trackers. Sorry for "re-opening" this thread, but I believe that at least the solution proposed for problem 1 would be a very reasonable way of avoiding stalled torrents, and like said, I also believe that per tracker might be a bit of an overkill, but that also depends on how it would impact the overall performance of Sonarr and how costly one and the other solution would be to implement.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |